For all Media Inquiries, please contact:
Andrew Heller
Communication Coordinator & Senior Writer
aheller@ecic4kids.org
517.371.9000
Recent release:
For IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 25, 2009
Michigan voters say no to funding cuts
for early childhood programs
Poll finds overwhelming majority wants preschool, family services saved
Seventy-five percent consider it “extremely” or “very” important to spare
Similarly, 83 percent of those polled think early childhood development and education is “an absolute necessity” for their community, including 69 percent who strongly believe that.
The poll of 500
“With times so hard and unemployment at 14 percent, Michigan families need early childhood programs and supports like pre-K, home visits and child care subsidies more than ever,” said Judy Samelson, CEO of ECIC, a public nonprofit corporation working on behalf of young families. “Legislators face truly horrible choices with this budget. But children, their future and the state’s future are not choices. They are necessities.”
Samelson was backed by a broad coalition of state organizations opposed to state cuts to early childhood programs. The coalition includes the American Academy of Pediatrics – Michigan Chapter, Children’s Trust Fund, Children’s Charter, Fight Crime: Invest in Kids, Great Start Collaboratives, Great Start Parent Coalitions, Michigan Association for the Education of Young Children, Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health, Michigan Association of United Ways, Michigan’s Children, Michigan Coalition of Children and Families, Michigan Council for Maternal and Child Health and Michigan League for Human Services.
“As any parent knows, providing for the needs of young children is not an optional activity,” said Nancy Moody, chairperson of the Children's Trust Fund. “The state must not fail to meet its responsibilities to
Ingham County Sheriff Gene Wriggelsworth, executive committee member of Fight Crime: Invest in Kids Michigan, said: "We urge lawmakers to restore funding to the proven early childhood education and care programs that give kids the right start and keep them out of our prisons. Today, it costs as much to send someone to prison as it does to send them to
The
· People across the state view investing in early childhood as necessary, with voters in
· Regardless of political affiliation, voters say these programs are vital, with 85 percent of Democrats, 63 percent of independents and 61 percent of Republicans strongly agreeing.
· 74 percent favor investing in early childhood even if it raises their taxes.
· 50 percent of likely voters said the state already spends “too little” on early childhood development and education. Only 6 percent of voters believe
· 95 percent said the years from birth to age 5 were either “extremely important” (65 percent) to learning and development or “very important” (30 percent). Research shows that 85 percent of a child’s brain architecture is formed by age 3.
· 91 percent said ensuring that all children arrive at kindergarten ready to learn was either “extremely important” (56 percent) or “very important” (35 percent).
· 54 percent said they would be “much more likely” or “somewhat more likely” to vote for candidates who favor maintaining funding.
The poll comes as
· Elimination of pre-K programs for 30,500
· Reductions in child care supports for low-income working families ($135 million).
· A reduction of at least $25 million to Medicaid providers who offer health care services to children 0-5.
· Elimination of three programs to prevent child abuse and neglect: 0-3 Secondary Prevention, Nurse-Family Partnership and Great Parents, Great Start – totaling $14 million.
· Elimination of all funding ($14.3 million) for the Early Childhood Investment Corporation. Thirteen million of those dollars go for programs and supports that increase the quality of child care in
· A reduction of $750,000 for Michigan’s 55 Great Start Collaboratives, which study local problems facing young learners and their parents then make a community plan to maximize resources, minimize waste, eliminate duplication of services and develop programs to “fill the gaps” in early childhood services.








